245 N. Waco, Ste. 402
Wichita, Kansas 67202
Email

Wichita (316) 262-8361
Toll Free (800) 356-8966
Fax (316) 263-0610

• Kansas Supreme Court
  • Haysville State Bank v. Hauserman, 225 Kan. 671, 594 P.2d 172 (1979). (Trial Court's judgment against client bank holding that bank's claim on guaranty agreement should have been raised as a compulsory counterclaim in previous litigation is reversed.)
  • Executive Financial Services v. Pagel, 238 Kan. 809, 715 P.2d 381 (1986). (Judgment in favor of client involving UCC priority dispute and entrustment doctrine concerning collateral is affirmed.)
  • Southwest Nat'l Bank of Wichita v. A.T.G. Constr. Mgt., Inc., 241 Kan. 257, 736 P.2d 1984(1987). (Trial Court's judgment finding client bank was not involved in a joint venture with borrower and that receiver appointed by client properly performed his duties is affirmed.)
• Kansas Court of Appeals
  • In re Guardianship & Conservatorship of Watkins, 24 Kan. App.2d 469 (1997). (Disabled persons may have their conservator transfer their assets to a supplemental needs trust for the conservatee's own benefit where the requisites of 42 U.S.C. §§1396p(d)(4)(A) are met.)
• United States Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals
  • Griffin v. Federal Land Bank of Wichita, 902 F.2d 22 (10th Cir. 1990). (Judgment in favor of client holding there is no implied cause of action against Farm Credit System institutions for violations of the federal Farm Credit Act.)
• United States District Court
  • CoBank, A.C.B. v. Reorganized Farmers Cooperative Association, 334 F. Supp.2d 1273 (2004) (Lender liability claims for breach of contract, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and tortious interference with contract seeking actual damages in excess of $12,000,000 dismissed following motion for summary judgment.)
  • Renick Brothers, Inc. v. Federal Land Bank Association of Dodge City, 721 F.Supp. 1198 (D.Kan. 1989) (No implied cause of action under Farm Credit Act exists.)
  • In re Mueller, 71 B.R. 165 (D. Kan. 1987). (Client's objection to life insurance exemption claimed by Debtor as being in fraud of creditors affirmed.)
• United States Bankruptcy Court
  • In re Olson, 61 B.R. 384 (Bankr. Kan. 1986). (Client obtained default judgment against Debtors in the amount of $170,000 and exception to discharge as sanctions for Debtors' failure to comply with discovery orders.)